Religious Text and Metaphorical Thinking: New Opportunities Afforded by the Cognitive Approach

Authors

  • Pavlo Yeremieiev

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71294/ers.2025.05

Keywords:

cognitive metaphor, religious texts, conceptual blending, language games, hermeneutics, literalness, religious discourse.

Abstract

Abstract. The article analyses the potential of applying the cognitive theory of metaphor to the study of religious texts and demonstrates the relevance of this approach for contemporary religious studies. It outlines the prospects of using Lakoff and Johnson’s ideas for examining religious discourse while also demonstrating the necessity of adjusting them, since in religious traditions the boundary between the literal and the metaphorical is fluid and becomes an object of inquiry in its own right. The article shows that recent corpus-based projects (particularly CRC 1475 “Metaphors of Religion”) open up new opportunities for cross-cultural and diachronic analysis of religious metaphors and make it possible to identify large-scale patterns of religious meaning-making. At the same time, it highlights several methodological challenges, such as the loss of cultural specificity in translation and the problem of discriminating between literal and metaphorical meanings, which requires combining corpus methods with hermeneutical and contextual analysis. The article examines the analytical potential and limitations of approaches developed by Gerard Steen, Zoltán Kövecses and Wojciech Wrzosek, including the distinction between deliberate, “living,” and dogmatized metaphors. Select examples are used to demonstrate the results of applying conceptual blending theory to religious narratives. The article further offers a critical assessment of the “presumption of metaphoricality” in secular interpretations of sacred texts and argues for the necessity of integrating cognitive metaphor theory with the concept of language games and hermeneutical approaches.

References

Aristotle (1926), The Art of Rhetoric, translated by J. H. Freese, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.; Heinemann, London.

Artemov, N., Simonis, L., Sobisch, J.-U. (eds.), (2025), Sealing, Molding, Imprinting, and Inscribing as Religious Metaphors, Metaphor Papers 22, Ruhr-Universität Bochum. https://doi.org/10.46586/mp.422

Artemov, N., Kueppers, E., Reimann, S., Rodenhausen, L., Wiemann, A. (2024), “Taking MIPVU Further Around the World–And Through the Ages. MIPVU for Religion-Related Texts: Challenges and Benefits”, Metaphor Papers, № 9. https://doi.org/10.46586/mp.299

Asad, T. (2001), “Reading a Modern Classic: W. C. Smith’s The Meaning and End of Religion”, History of Religions, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/463633

Bergin, T., Fisch, M. (1948), The New Science of Giambattista Vico, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Bostock, G. (1987), “Allegory and the Interpretation of the Bible in Origen”, Literature and Theology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 39–53.

Cantrell, M. A. (2016), “Must a Scholar of Religion Be Methodologically Atheistic or Agnostic?”, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 373–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfv066

CERES – Center for Religious Studies (2024), “CRC 1475: Metaphors of Religion”, available at: https://ceres.rub.de/en/research/projects/sfb1475/ (accessed 04 December 2025).

Elwert, F., Kueppers, E., Krech, V., Reimann, S., Rodenhausen, L., Wiemann, A. (2025), “Professions as Religious Metaphors”, Metaphor Papers. https://doi.org/10.46586/mp.434

Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. (2003), The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, Basic Books, New York.

Galadari, A. (2018), Qur'anic Hermeneutics: Between Science, History, and the Bible, Bloomsbury Academic, London–New York. https://doi.org/10.1111/rirt.13525

Galadari, A. (2021), Metaphors of Death and Resurrection in the Qur’an: An Intertextual Approach with Biblical and Rabbinic Literature, Bloomsbury Academic, London. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350244559

Gibbs, W. R. (2000), “Making good psychology out of blending theory”, Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 11, No. 3–4, pp. 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.020

Gomola, A. (2018), Conceptual Blending in Early Christian Discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of Pastoral Metaphors in Patristic Literature, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110582970

Josephson Storm, J. Ā. (2021), Metamodernism: The Future of Theory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Knibbe, K., Droogers, A. (2011), “Methodological Ludism and the Academic Study of Religion”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, № 23, pp. 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006811X608395

Kövecses, Z. (2002), Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, Oxford University Press, New York.

Kövecses, Z. (2011), “The Biblical Story Retold: A Cognitive Linguistic Perspective”, Brdar, M., Gries, S. Th., Žic Fuchs, M. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam–Philadelphia, pp. 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.19kov

Kövecses, Z. (2020), “A Brief Outline of ‘Standard’ Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Some Outstanding Issues”, Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127.002

Krech, V., Karis, T., Elwert, F. (2023), “Metaphors of Religion: A Conceptual Framework”, Metaphor Papers. https://doi.org/10.46586/mp.282

Lakoff, G. (1991), “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf”, Peace Research, Vol. 23, No. 2/3, pp. 25–32.

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lundhaug, H. (2010), Images of Rebirth: Cognitive Poetics and Transformational Soteriology in the Gospel of Philip and the Exegesis on the Soul, Leiden–Boston: Brill.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, University of Minnesota Press.

Osborne, G. R. (2006), The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, Special ed., IVP Academic, Downers Grove, IL.

Pocock, J. (2009), Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method, Cambridge University Press.

Ricœur, P. (1978), The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Ryliškytė, L. (2017), “Metaphor and Analogy in Theology: A Choice between Lions and Witches, and Wardrobes?”, Theological Studies, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 696–717.

Skinner, Q. (1969), “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory, Vol. 8, pp. 3–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504188

Smith, W. C. (1991), The Meaning and the End of Religion, Fortress Press.

Sobisch, J.-U. (2025), “‘Nothing to Be Practiced’ (bsgom du med): What Conceptual Blendings and Metaphors Reveal About an Ancient Kagyu Concept”, Entangled Religions, Vol. 14, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.46586/er.14.2025.12536

Steen, G. J. (2023), Slowing Metaphor Down: Elaborating Deliberate Metaphor Theory, John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.26

Swiggers, P. (1984), “Cognitive Aspects of Aristotle’s Theory of Metaphor”, Glotta, Bd. 62, H. 1./2., pp. 40–45.

Tacey, D. (2015), Religion as Metaphor: Beyond Literal Belief, Routledge, New York–London. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2016.1206309

Vermeulen, T., van den Akker, R. (2010), “Notes on Metamodernism”, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, Vol. 2, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677

Wittgenstein, L. (1967), Philosophical Investigations, transl. G. E. M. Anscombe, 3rd ed., Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Andrew of Crete (2000), The Great Canon of Andrew of Crete. Service in the First and Fifth Weeks of Great Lent [In Ukrainian], Svichado, Lviv.

Aristotle, Horace, Pseudo-Longinus (2007), Ancient Poetics. Aristotle: Poetics. Pseudo-Longinus: On the Sublime. Horace: On the Art of Poetry [In Ukrainian], edited by M. Boretsky and V. Zvarych, Hramota, Kyiv.

Wojcieszak, V. (2012), History – Culture – Metaphor. The Emergence of Non-Classical Historiography; On Historical Thinking [In Ukrainian], translated by V. S. Sahan, S. O. Seriakov, V. V. Sklokin; academic editors: A. M. Kyrydon, S. S. Troyan, V. V. Sklokin, Nika-Center, Kyiv.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2000), Truth and Method. Hermeneutics I: Foundations of Philosophical Hermeneutics, Vol. 1 [In Ukrainian], translated from German, Univers, Kyiv.

Domańska, E. (2012), History and Contemporary Humanities: Studies in the Theory of Knowledge about the Past [In Ukrainian], translated from Polish and English by V. Sklokin; academic editors: V. Sklokin, S. Troyan, Nika-Center, Kyiv.

Cox, J. L. (2011), “Religion Without God: Methodological Agnosticism and the Future of Religious Studies” [In Ukrainian], Religious Studies Essays [In Ukrainian], No. 2, pp. 129–138.

Kolodny, A. M. (1999), The Phenomenon of Religion: Nature, Structure, Functionality, Trends [In Ukrainian], Svit Znan, Kyiv.

Kravets, L. V. (2018, updated 2023), “Metaphor” [In Ukrainian], Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine [In Ukrainian], available at: https://esu.com.ua/article-66695 (accessed December 1, 2024).

Le Goff, J. (2007), Medieval Imagination [In Ukrainian], translated from French by Ya. Kravets , Litosyp, Lviv.

Potebnia, A. A. (1892), Thought and Language [In Russian], 2nd ed., Kharkiv.

Published

2026-04-08

Issue

Section

Theory and methodology